Gholamali Seifi zinab; Mohammad Ahmadnezhad bahnamiri; Mohammadreza Dargahi
Abstract
Several views have been raised about the situation between couples in the Islamic Imams and Islamic Laws of Iran. Some jurists and lawyers believe that coupling between couples is reprehensible, and coupling is not a reason for not being able to refer. However, some jurists believe that pairedness is ...
Read More
Several views have been raised about the situation between couples in the Islamic Imams and Islamic Laws of Iran. Some jurists and lawyers believe that coupling between couples is reprehensible, and coupling is not a reason for not being able to refer. However, some jurists believe that pairedness is a reason for the impossibility of referring to hafa, and after the couple's hubs there is no possibility of referrals. .What is the point of view about the situation between couples? It is a question that can be argued that in the common life of couples is absolute, or is it bound by the implicit condition of durability? In the sense of being bound by the implicit condition of survival, the duration of the couple is that the couples, given the assumption of the continuity of the financial couple to their spouse, make the coexistence of the coin in absolute lifetime not absolute. For this reason, after a violent violation, you will be required to regain money. If we consider the attachment of the couple between the couples during a lifetime, there are other issues, including the reasons for the implicit condition of the couple's durability, the nature of the implicit condition of the durability of the couple, etc. We can explain this.
